This Is Real Life
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Marilyn Monroe and The Many Women Who Idolize Her
Aside from the fact that Marilyn Monroe was absolutely stunning I wondered why so many women young and old alike idolized Marilyn Monroe. She was a beautiful woman who owned her sexiness but who was still vulnerable and fragile. Maybe a lot of woman connect with that. Owning their power but still being vulnerable and weak at times. It's hard to stay strong all the time. Maybe it was because she was ahead of her time in showing off her sexiness. There hadn't really been anyone as open with their sexuality and being comfortable with it like Marilyn Monroe. She broke the mold in that sense. Maybe it was the fact that she died young. She is timeless. When you think of Marilyn Monroe you will forever see her youth and beauty. People will be talking about her for lifetimes. There also was more of a sense of mystery with her. In today's world we have the internet where everything a celeb does gets turned into a blog or news article and paparazzi who love to follow celebs and aid in our guilty pleasure. Imagine there had been a reality show with Marilyn Monroe I wonder if people would consider her iconic today or if she would have been another beautiful face passing through Hollywood. Her sense of mystery left people wanting more. People attempt to connect with her mystery based on a few things they do know. Either way Marilyn Monroe has legions of young women who idolize her going as far as tattooing her face on their body. She represents something to these people.
Why do you think Marilyn Monroe has had such an impact on generations of women?
Check out 40 Memorable Marilyn Monroe Quotes
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Why Do Nice Guys Finish Last?
Why do nice guys finish last?? Well… It’s because you’re boring.
I’m just saying what most women are
afraid to say. I hate to say this but it’s
true. I just want to help you extra nice guys out there. My guess is that all you nice guys asking “why do
nice guys finish last?” “why is she with that asshole?” “What does he have that
I don’t?” I bet you have been friend
zoned by all of your female “friends” or rather all the girls you secretly wish
you could hook up with. I feel it’s very
important to share this with guys as I have so many guy friends who don’t even
realize they have been friend zoned by women let alone why. They will
constantly pursue and never get anywhere.
I mean this is pretty much a primal thing here. Women like to feel
protected, safe, and secure. She wants to have excitement and adventure in her
life. If you’re too nice you come across as weak. Let me make it clear though women are all for nice
men but with spice and manliness there. Being kind and generous is far different than
being overly nice and accommodating to every situation with no backbone. This is especially true for women who are
strong and independent. Strong and independent women are strong and fiery most
of the times in their life and your lack of having a take charge attitude makes her feel like she is not in an equal partnership. That she is the dominant one all the time. She
wants to be in charge sometimes but a man needs to know when it’s time for him
to take charge. Also there is this
underlying fear that accompanying your niceness and your lack of ability to be
dominant that you would not be a great partner sexually. That’s
just real. Guys I am not telling you to
change who you are nor should you. I am just giving you some insight to what a
lot of women feel. Use that to your advantage or not. That’s your choice.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Monday, January 28, 2013
Should The Boy Scouts Lift Ban On Gays?
In 2000 The Boy Scouts won a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing the organization to ban gays. Over the last few years there has been an increase of activists supporting the lifting of the ban. Should the Boy Scouts lift their ban on gays? In my opinion yes. Absolutely. I mean what was the mentality when banning these children in the first place? "Let's not have gays around our normal non gay kids so that the non gays kids don't become infected with gayness?" I mean really what exactly would be a valid reason for banning them in the first place? They are children not terrorists.
Aside from how terribly exclusive The Boy Scouts have been to gays and how that has affected millions of gay youth I think we can all agree that we do not want to send our children the message that it's okay to exclude someone based on their sexual preference. Their sexual preference does not make them any less human. Their sexual preference has no bearing on whether or not they are capable of saving lives. They are human beings that have a sexual preference not animals. There are kids out there who are gay and who want to be in the boy scouts to learn and experience exactly what their non gay friends get to experience.The Boys Scouts has the ability to teach all children valuable things. The knowledge these kids can take from this can save the life of someone else or themselves one day. Why would we not allow gay children to join and learn. Do we want to discourage learning? Is that the message we want to send out. "Gay children you are not worthy to learn" Let's encourage learning to all our young youth. The Boy Scouts should be thinking the same way. They should want to expand the minds of all children. I guarantee if a man saved your life one day from something he learned in The Boy Scouts you would be grateful to him and The Boy Scouts and once you learned he was Gay you would be grateful you supported the lifting of such a ridiculous ban.
Come on Boy Scouts do the right thing here. What do you think The Boy Scouts should do?
Aside from how terribly exclusive The Boy Scouts have been to gays and how that has affected millions of gay youth I think we can all agree that we do not want to send our children the message that it's okay to exclude someone based on their sexual preference. Their sexual preference does not make them any less human. Their sexual preference has no bearing on whether or not they are capable of saving lives. They are human beings that have a sexual preference not animals. There are kids out there who are gay and who want to be in the boy scouts to learn and experience exactly what their non gay friends get to experience.The Boys Scouts has the ability to teach all children valuable things. The knowledge these kids can take from this can save the life of someone else or themselves one day. Why would we not allow gay children to join and learn. Do we want to discourage learning? Is that the message we want to send out. "Gay children you are not worthy to learn" Let's encourage learning to all our young youth. The Boy Scouts should be thinking the same way. They should want to expand the minds of all children. I guarantee if a man saved your life one day from something he learned in The Boy Scouts you would be grateful to him and The Boy Scouts and once you learned he was Gay you would be grateful you supported the lifting of such a ridiculous ban.
Come on Boy Scouts do the right thing here. What do you think The Boy Scouts should do?
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Feels Like There Is More To Manti Te'o's Story
If you've been following the details of this Manti Te'o story you would know that he supposedly met a girl online whom he developed a relationship with and fell in love. This girl apparently was sick with cancer and passed away. At the same time of his girlfriends passing his Grandmother also passed away. This was a very trying time in his life. This past December he received a call from his Girlfriend who passed away. Apparently she is not dead or didn't exist at all. I think everyone is unclear still on the exact truth. There are NFL players who claim to have met this girl that we don't know for sure exists. Now this is being called a hoax. She didn't really exist. It's extremely difficult to understand or get correct facts in this odd story because it is all over the place. One thing for sure is it's not really about sports.
I am sure we are all really struggling to understand the truth or what really happened but I want to know why this is on ESPN? Why is this sports news? If she called in December why are we talking about this now in the latter part of January? Why is ND holding press conferences about a players personal drama? I can understand if he did something wrong himself and the Coaches would need to address his personal behavior and actions but this wasn't about anything he did at all. I am not sold on this being completely contrite. Obviously this now has given him instant national fame and exposure. If he was embarrassed like he so says why say anything at all? How does him saying anything to ND change a thing or help him? I really do want to understand the story and what really happened. I believe there is some truth to some of the story but I question the motives for saying anything. People make choices. I am sure he thought about his options before saying anything. What would make you lean towards saying something to your team?
What do you think? Is he genuine and telling the complete truth or is there more to the story??
I am sure we are all really struggling to understand the truth or what really happened but I want to know why this is on ESPN? Why is this sports news? If she called in December why are we talking about this now in the latter part of January? Why is ND holding press conferences about a players personal drama? I can understand if he did something wrong himself and the Coaches would need to address his personal behavior and actions but this wasn't about anything he did at all. I am not sold on this being completely contrite. Obviously this now has given him instant national fame and exposure. If he was embarrassed like he so says why say anything at all? How does him saying anything to ND change a thing or help him? I really do want to understand the story and what really happened. I believe there is some truth to some of the story but I question the motives for saying anything. People make choices. I am sure he thought about his options before saying anything. What would make you lean towards saying something to your team?
What do you think? Is he genuine and telling the complete truth or is there more to the story??
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Could Double O.T Have Been Avoided In The Broncos vs. Ravens Game?
So the Playoff games this weekend so far have been great! The most entertaining ones coming down to the wire. I want to talk specifically about the Broncos vs the Ravens What a great football game. Very entertaining. Who doesn't love to see a game go into double o.t in the Playoffs. With all that said should it have even went into o.t?
Let's discuss. Let's take it back to when the Ravens tied the game and there was 31 seconds left on the clock and Denver had 2 timeouts remaining. To win this game the Broncos didn't need a Touchdown they only needed 3 points. This only required them to get into field goal range. So I ask this, Peyton Manning is your QB you have 31 seconds left on the clock with 2 timeouts why would you not attempt to to win the game then? 31 seconds with 2 timeouts is an eternity to a QB like Peyton Manning. Was there not faith in their QB to get them 40-ish yards or attempt it to win the game. At the very least he could have taken some valid shots all while having the safety net of o.t.
We all know how this game ended. The Ravens won this game in double o.t by a field goal. I've been watching Peyton Manning for years and I have faith in his abilities. I fully believe this was a bad coaching call. You play(and coach) to win the game and they did not play to win the game. I already can hear some people saying "you have to play it safe" yea I get it but if you're a playoff team you should have faith enough in your players abilities to win the game. No risk no gain. There are times when playing it safe is the good coaching call but this in my opinion was not one of them. What do you think? Should they have attempted to get into field goal rage to win the game? Either way Congrats to the Ravens who took advantage of o.t!
Let's discuss. Let's take it back to when the Ravens tied the game and there was 31 seconds left on the clock and Denver had 2 timeouts remaining. To win this game the Broncos didn't need a Touchdown they only needed 3 points. This only required them to get into field goal range. So I ask this, Peyton Manning is your QB you have 31 seconds left on the clock with 2 timeouts why would you not attempt to to win the game then? 31 seconds with 2 timeouts is an eternity to a QB like Peyton Manning. Was there not faith in their QB to get them 40-ish yards or attempt it to win the game. At the very least he could have taken some valid shots all while having the safety net of o.t.
We all know how this game ended. The Ravens won this game in double o.t by a field goal. I've been watching Peyton Manning for years and I have faith in his abilities. I fully believe this was a bad coaching call. You play(and coach) to win the game and they did not play to win the game. I already can hear some people saying "you have to play it safe" yea I get it but if you're a playoff team you should have faith enough in your players abilities to win the game. No risk no gain. There are times when playing it safe is the good coaching call but this in my opinion was not one of them. What do you think? Should they have attempted to get into field goal rage to win the game? Either way Congrats to the Ravens who took advantage of o.t!
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
The Lottery and Your Dreams
Today
while doing some research I happened to stumble upon a website about playing the lottery. The author of the article went into great detail about how it’s a
complete waste of money, thoughts, and resources. He goes on to state some
numbers and how you end up wasting so much money in the long run and getting
nothing in return. This guy pretty much tells you in the article to be
realistic and to not dream about winning and his best advice was not to play.
Although I can certainly understand where his
thoughts are coming from since they are based on statistical facts I still disagree with him. I am absolutely not telling you to go gamble
away your savings to try to win big, however I do think that you can take a
reasonable 5 bucks give or take a little less or a little more depending on your income and buy some
tickets that give you the opportunity to change your life. It’s ok and very healthy for you to dream.
You have infinitely more chances to win than those who don’t play. Period. If
you don’t play/try you can’t win. It’s that simple.
For
me the real issue here isn’t about the lottery and statistics it’s how easy and
quickly people will be to shoot down someone else’s dreams or their own. In regards to the lottery someone has to win
right? Why can’t that someone be you?
Most people I know play the lottery not necessarily because they are
definitely going to win but because it fills them with hope! Hope for luck,
hope for a better future, hope to fulfill their dreams etc.
I
say to everyone dream whatever dreams make you feel happy no matter how
big whether it’s winning the lottery
or becoming a famous actress. There are going to be those people who will tell you
that you’re wasting your time etc. That’s the kind of person you need to
immediately disassociate yourself from.
Stay around those who believe in the beauty of your dreams and who will
uplift you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)